CNC Gunsmithing Forum
September 07, 2010, 05:41:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Justin Update
 
   Home   Help Login Register  

Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: 80% AR15 Lowers - Std Mag / 9mm Mag / Sten Mag - Where to get them  (Read 6208 times)
Prototype Services
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 386


« Reply #40 on: June 17, 2009, 04:22:03 PM »

The DSA forging is 0%, as it has had ZERO machine work towards finishing. It is straight out of the forging die.
 The 80% have had all the machine work done except for the FCG pocket and pin holes, allowing you to finish the last 20%.
Billet also has to have the outside shape machined from a block of material, so it is always more expensive due to machine time.
Logged
tommyid1
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 11


« Reply #41 on: August 28, 2009, 12:58:03 AM »

yellowlogic or someone should come up with a magwell that will feed glock 17 mags.  that would be soooooooo nice.
Logged
Tango Chaser
Tango Chaser Tactical LLC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 592


« Reply #42 on: August 28, 2009, 01:08:31 PM »

Quote
yellowlogic or someone should come up with a magwell that will feed glock 17 mags.  that would be soooooooo nice.

Olympic Arms and Rock River Arms already did.
Logged
NH-Moose
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 122


« Reply #43 on: August 28, 2009, 01:50:10 PM »

I'm not very impressed with my Olympic lower that takes Glock 9mm mags. The mag catch shelf (on the mag itself) rounds off quickly, and then the mag fails to stay in reliably. I've wasted 2 mags so far, and a 3rd is starting to fail.  Essentially, it eats mags. And the last round hold open lever is hoky and unreliable. Much better to find a metal magazine solution. The concept is great, but the execution seems too hastily done.

That said, the Oly upper eats feeds all ammo I've ever tried.

Both of my "c" style 9mm rifles using Hahn dedicated blocks also feed 100% reliably (FMJ) and Colt or BDM mags, the SBR being my favorite at the range, second only to the spike 22.
« Last Edit: August 28, 2009, 01:51:52 PM by NH-Moose » Logged
mb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #44 on: August 30, 2009, 01:07:40 PM »

I've looked at and been asked to look at a Glock-mag model lower.  Trying to get everything right takes time and right now I'm spread a little thin.  These are on my To Do list, in front of investment cast lowers from stainless which is another popular request for AR15 and AR10.

Mag catch and bolt hold open are the stumbling blocks for me as I want it perfect and won't settle for less.  I've got 8 blank lowers with no mag well cut (beveled on the bottom for the standard mag well) that could easily be cut for glock mags if someone wants to roll their own.  Post or send me a PM if you want to talk about it.
Logged
Tango Chaser
Tango Chaser Tactical LLC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 592


« Reply #45 on: August 31, 2009, 03:26:26 AM »

mb,

You know manufacturers are supposed to provide every new product buyers can think of the day after the part is requested with all R&D conducted within that 24hr window and priced below mfg costs to include overnight shipping. The part must work 100% of the time for the entire life of the buyer no matter how he/she takes care of or handles the product.

And as soon as you make a part no one else in the world is making, buyers will complain you didn't make it do "this" or "that" or it should have looked different, or they wouldn't have done it that way, etc., etc.

Don't forget that if a customer complains about your product, you must send a check or the purchase price and a new part within 24hr to include shipping. Oh, they will send the bad part back to after they have tested the new part or keep for their troubles.

You must also wait by the computer/phone/fax machine 24hrs a day in case a buyer has an issue with your product.


Don't you just love "Great Idea Fairies"? Grin
Logged
IOWOLF
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 108


« Reply #46 on: August 31, 2009, 03:45:56 AM »

The previous was told in Jest, I'm sure, but is a fact in many cases.
Logged
Tango Chaser
Tango Chaser Tactical LLC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 592


« Reply #47 on: August 31, 2009, 03:47:59 AM »

Quote
The previous was told in Jest, I'm sure, but is a fact in many cases.

Quote was from my own experiences and yes, smiley faces all around. Grin
Logged
mb
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 137


« Reply #48 on: September 07, 2009, 11:43:40 PM »

mb,

You know manufacturers are supposed to provide every new product buyers can think of the day after the part is requested with all R&D conducted within that 24hr window and priced below mfg costs to include overnight shipping. The part must work 100% of the time for the entire life of the buyer no matter how he/she takes care of or handles the product.

And as soon as you make a part no one else in the world is making, buyers will complain you didn't make it do "this" or "that" or it should have looked different, or they wouldn't have done it that way, etc., etc.

Don't forget that if a customer complains about your product, you must send a check or the purchase price and a new part within 24hr to include shipping. Oh, they will send the bad part back to after they have tested the new part or keep for their troubles.

You must also wait by the computer/phone/fax machine 24hrs a day in case a buyer has an issue with your product.


Don't you just love "Great Idea Fairies"? Grin

Humm... where to start...

The best thing I can say is at least I like R&D.  Mostly.

 Cool

I have been very lucky with a great client base to date.  From customers and others I get a ton of ideas - some aren't as workable as others - but none the less, it's been very positive.  This whole process for me has been a learning curve.  Sure, sometimes you get someone who's looking for a reason to gripe or whatever and two of those guys are still trying to order one of my standard lowers.

Other people are positive experiences.  Some now have that prize piece and are content, a lot become repeat customers and a few offer up ideas that they would either like to see become a reality or have a product idea of their own.  I try to give everybody a little time, from idea pitches to inquiries about what if any, work I have available.

But Tango, I see and have experienced what you're talking about and have been lucky so far.  Sure I've felt a little of that pain (think pistol caliber lowers...), but overall, something must be ok because I keep doing this.  My other business... well, that's another story.  And maybe a glass of bourbon.

For the casual reader of this, R&D for me takes a long time and drives my wife crazy.  Some pieces and parts have been floating around forever and will never make beyond being on paper.  Others end up part way and never progress.  Anyone want to buy a billet lower cut for a Thompson mag or how about one for a Sten mag that's cut .300" further back?? 

Give me a solution to a problem that I can pound out in 24 hours and I will find a reason it will fail before 24 hours is up.  I've got a tub of scrap to prove it.  Well, that and some credit card bills!
Logged
Tango Chaser
Tango Chaser Tactical LLC
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 592


« Reply #49 on: September 16, 2009, 12:48:19 AM »

Justin and I bounced ideas off each other for 6 months before Justin made the first AR45. One of the first posts after he posted pictures asked why he didn't make it fit the Thompson mag. No credit for a product that solved a mag problem for a .45 conversion and used an existing upper and unmodified mags, just "hey why not make it this way" posts.

Douche bags!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!